도널드 트럼프 전 대통령과 관련된 뉴욕 법원 사건의 최신 업데이트입니다.
트럼프 전 대통령은 두 가지 사건에서 주목할 만한 진전을 보였습니다. 첫 번째는 기업 사기 판결과 관련된 보석금이 $454백만에서 $175백만으로 대폭 감소했다는 점입니다. 이로 인해 트럼프 전 대통령은 재산 몰수를 막기 위해 훨씬 적은 금액을 지불할 수 있게 되었습니다. 이는 단기적인 승리로 보이나, 장기적으로는 아직 결정되지 않았습니다.
두 번째 사건은 트럼프 전 대통령이 2016년 선거 동안 포르노 배우 스토미 대니얼스와의 관계를 숨기기 위해 비밀 유지 금전 지급을 가리기 위해 사업 기록을 조작한 혐의로 기소되었다는 점입니다. 이로 인해 그는 4월 15일부터 재판에 회부될 예정이며, 이는 그가 형사 범죄로 재판을 받는 최초의 전 미국 대통령이 될 것임을 의미합니다. 트럼프 전 대통령은 이러한 재판이 선거 개입과 유권자 협박의 순수한 사례라고 주장하며, 선거 도중에 재판을 받아야 한다는 점에 불만을 표시했습니다.
재판 과정에서 배심원 선정의 중요성이 강조되었습니다. 법률 전문가들은 배심원 선정 과정이 얼마나 중요한지를 강조하며, 트럼프 전 대통령의 법률팀은 자신들에게 유리한 배심원을 선정하기 위해 노력할 것입니다. 이는 재판의 결과에 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.
한편, 트럼프 전 대통령의 법적 문제는 그의 정치적 미래에도 중요한 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 특히, 여러 사건이 선거 이전에 재판에 회부될 가능성에 대해 논의가 있었습니다. 그러나, 복잡한 법적 및 사실적 쟁점으로 인해 빠른 재판이 어려울 것으로 보입니다.
이러한 법적 도전에도 불구하고, 트럼프 전 대통령은 계속해서 강력한 정치적 영향력을 행사하고 있으며, 여러 재판과 관련된 발전은 그의 지지자들과 비평가들 사이에서 계속해서 논쟁의 대상이 되고 있습니다.
Here's the latest update on the New York court cases related to former President Donald Trump.
Trump has seen significant developments in two cases. The first is a substantial reduction in the bail amount related to a corporate fraud verdict, from $454 million to $175 million. This allows Trump to pay a much smaller amount to prevent asset forfeiture. While this appears to be a short-term victory, the long-term outcome is yet to be determined.
The second case involves charges against Trump for falsifying business records to hide a hush money payment made during the 2016 election to conceal his affair with porn actress Stormy Daniels. As a result, he is scheduled to stand trial starting April 15, making him the first former U.S. president to face criminal charges. Trump has criticized these proceedings as pure election interference and voter intimidation, expressing discontent with being tried during an election.
The importance of jury selection in the trial process has been emphasized. Legal experts have highlighted how crucial the selection process is, and Trump's legal team will likely strive to select jurors favorable to their case, which could significantly impact the trial's outcome.
Meanwhile, Trump's legal troubles could also have a significant effect on his political future. There has been discussion about the possibility of several cases going to trial before the election. However, due to complex legal and factual issues, a speedy trial seems unlikely.
Despite these legal challenges, Trump continues to wield significant political influence, and developments related to various trials remain a point of contention among his supporters and critics.
Donald Trump fraud bond cut to $175m | BBC News - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxva3M00VB4
Transcript:
(00:00) so for Donald Trump A Tale of Two New York Court cases today one he scored a major if temporary reprieve a panel of appet Judges app pellet I should say judges gave the former president 10 days breathing room to post bond in the corporate fraud judgment reducing the amount he needs to cover from $454 million to $175 million but then the bad news Manhattan judge Juan mhan told the former president he will go on trial starting April 15th on charges he falsified business records to cover up a hush money payment that was meant to
(00:35) hide his affair with the porn star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election that all but ensures Mr Trump will become the first ever former American president to go on trial for criminal offenses here he is responding after that ruling but this is a pure case of voter intimidation and election interference and it shouldn't be allowed to happen if this was a case could have been brought three and A2 years ago and they decide to wait now just during the election so that I won't be able to campaign let's start then in New York
(01:10) where Neda toi has been braving the cold for us this afternoon Neda good to see you um so a disappointment for Donald Trump because they've been trying to further delay um and some news today that he intends to testify in this trial yeah well look Donald Trump's uh lawyer the district attorney has said you know has long sought to delay these trials and they said enough is enough before this before this pre-trial hearing today and it wasn't a great day for Donald Trump's lawyers because the judge repeatedly shot down their
(01:44) accusations of prose prosecutorial misconduct saying you know I don't even know why we're here the District Attorney's office has gone above and beyond to get all the materials in their possession to Trump's legal team and this was all about some extra document that came from federal prosecutors But ultimately you know the district attorney says that a delay of 30 days of this trial is more than enough for Donald Trump's team to go through that and so the judge agreed and set April 15th as the start of this trial which is
(02:16) significant because there was a big question if any of Donald Trump's four criminal trials would actually start before the November presidential election so that is where it stands now Donald Trump's lawyers say that they will keep appealing that they don't feel that Donald Trump should be here on trial during an election campaign but uh as it stands now he certainly will be and he spoke there as we heard again calling this a Witch Hunt and he has certainly made these campaigns into these uh Court hearings and and cases
(02:50) into something of a campaign stop along the way the general feeling is that this is the lesser of the criminal trials that he he faces but jury selection on April 15th it is a jury of his peers that will make the decision whether there is a two-tier justice system in the United States is IMM material once to get in that courtroom yeah that's exactly right and you know I can't stress enough how much legal experts say the jury selection process just how important it's going to be I mean Donald Trump's team knows that
(03:27) they just need one juror to have a hung jury in this case to get him acquitted of the charges against him and so they will be looking through every you know juror potential juror that comes up for questioning and picking who they want to exclude who they want to keep to try to kind of form in their view a jury that might be more sympathetic to their arguments and the same will be true from the District Attorney's uh office as well they want a jury uh that's going to be looking at the facts not have any
(04:00) biases not an informed opinion about Donald Trump one way or the other so certainly is going to be a situation where we could have a week or longer for jury selection because that's how much importance both sides are going to be putting on that Nea thank you for that let's bring in US Federal prosecutor former US Federal prosecutor Joe Moreno Joe always good to see you can we start with the New York case first of all um the the trial was delayed for 30 days for for Discovery reasons because the the the prosecution had come up with
(04:31) some new documents do you have any problem as a as a prosecutor with the way that was done well Christian it's a little unclear about how important those documents were uh it seems like the judge was not impressed beyond the 30 days he gave was to say okay there's really no harm to the defense that it took this long to get these documents from federal prosecutors because there's really not much relevant in there that either helps or hurts the defense so I'm not surprised that the cases going forward I do think however to your point
(05:03) that this is maybe the weakest of the various criminal cases I believe this case is very weak and so it's not inconceivable that Donald Trump could have the last laugh here because if he gets acquitted to your point even one juror holds out he could come away with this and say this is a big victory for me see I told you so yeah indeed so politically could be very important for him uh in the midst of all these cases um in terms of of the diary Joe I mean if we're looking at jury selection on the 15th of April where where do you
(05:35) think a verdict comes in the calendar before November I'd say it takes two weeks for jury selection it takes four to six weeks to have the trial so you're probably looking at Mid June for a for a verdict right with a sentencing there maybe three months later okay so possibly potentially let sentencing later if it ever did come to that I mean that puts the judge in an extraordinary position just ahead of an election sure well look this case is premised on financial accounting irregularities in Donald Trump's company
(06:13) which are misdemeanor crimes at best okay Alvin Bragg is trying to tie them to campaign Finance crimes which is a stretch and so there's going to be a lot of back and forth on that they are felonies so it's conceivable that Donald Trump could get jail time and again that goes to how the jury perceives this are they as serious as Alvin brag says they are or are they misdemeanors and basically um a slap on the wrist would be sufficient to address them okay uh so let's set that aside for a second I mean
(06:46) the good news for Donald Trump today given the immense difficulties he's had raising an eyering Bond of over $450 million is that it's it's less than half he's being asked to find and he has 10 days to do it um what was the basis for that decision and does that mean he's off the hook for the total amount well he's off the hook temporarily he doesn't have to come up with the roughly half a billion dollars uh just to have maintain the status quo it's a lot less than that now um it does
(07:17) not indicate though that he's off the hook in the long run it just basically gives him a chance to breathe and say okay I can put down a much smaller amount of cash in order to stop any property forfeitures while the appellant process goes on and that will take several years so in the meanwhile he has to put a lot less cash on the table he is again permitted to run the company which judge Enron had barred him from for three years and he's allowed to take out additional debt doesn't mean that banks will actually give him that debt
(07:50) but it allows him to me some more freedom to borrow against his property so yes absolutely a short-term Victory now whether it really leads to a longer term one that's years away from being decided I I I wonder if actually the the Democrats are breathing a sigh of relief today because I've been listening to the polls to Frank luns who says the one thing conservatives consistently ask him is why Democrats can't beat Donald Trump at The Ballot Box and if you've got a situation where Leticia James the
(08:19) Attorney General is is going to claim a Donald Trump property it does that does that look like overreach for the for the White House and and and are they implicated by virtue of that I mean I I have heard that speculation Christian that people say that might be a step too far that that people say it's one thing to try to hold Donald Trump accountable for crimes he may or may not have committed it's quite another thing to grab his property uh particularly when the appeals are still pending so I think
(08:53) I think that the the concept is maybe Democrats did get a pass on this because that's a step that may really you know anger voters to the point where they might say I might not have voted for Donald Trump before but this process seems so unfair to me that he might get my vote or I might just stay home and not vote for anyone so it seems to me Joe when you look at the the four cases in the round this one will go Fanny Willis um in in Georgia says that the train is coming that she's still intend on trying this before if
(09:28) she can before the election he's getting some favors from the judge in Florida the the documents case doesn't seem to be coming to trial and then you've got the problems Jack Smith's encountering in Washington is it actually possible that he doesn't face any of these issues before the ballot in November anything is possible but I I would say it's highly highly unlikely any of these cases will go to trial um before the election so I think you know the Alvin brag case um is the only one
(09:57) because it's relatively simple it was the first one to be charged and the Really the fact pattern in the law is not that complicated now again there will be appeals that will take years but the trial itself is probably three or four weeks um but as far as the other ones you're absolutely right there are both legal issues as well as complex factual issues that have to get worked out the idea that any of those would have happened this year was pretty aggressive and I don't see it happening
'국내해외이슈관련 요약리뷰' 카테고리의 다른 글
[요약리뷰] CNN - 트럼프의 채권 게시방법을 설명한 포브스 편집장 (0) | 2024.04.02 |
---|---|
[요약리뷰] CNN - 네타냐후의 행보 (2) | 2024.03.27 |
[요약리뷰] BBC - 볼티모어 다리, 배와 충돌하다 (0) | 2024.03.27 |
[요약리뷰] CNN - Diddy Combs 자택 압수수사 (0) | 2024.03.26 |
[요약리뷰] CNN - 정부 예산 법안에 반대표를 던지다 (2) | 2024.03.25 |